Issue link: https://resources.nanotempertech.com/i/1050653
23 — Evaluation of the suitability of the research strategy, approach, and alternative approaches — Potential of the proposed project to lead to new and important knowledge — Assessment of the work environment — Evaluation of the applicant's track record (e.g. number and impact of publications, grants funded, etc.) and how the proposed work fits with previous accomplishments — Appropriateness of the budget The review committee will then hold a meeting. Not all proposals will be discussed (approximately half will have been 'triaged'). The primary reviewers introduce the proposal and present their evaluations. There may be some discussion by the review committee before a final score or rating is assigned. Proposals are then given an overall ranking and final recommendations will be made. A cut-off of which ones will be funded are assigned based on the budget. Track your application and anticipate reviews so you are ready for the next step Track your application and be aware of dates when reviews and scores will be made available — but try not to check your email or the agency website obsessively! Keeping in mind that most applications are not funded the first time around, it's helpful to anticipate reviews and start addressing predicted criticisms. What can you do once you receive your score and summary statement? Get in touch with the program officer. They are present when the review committee meets and can help you interpret comments and weigh their importance. At this point, the final funding decisions may not have been made. If your score is near the expected cut-off, talk to the program officer about the reviewers' comments and address them. You may have some new relevant data or publications to mention. This may swing the decision in your favor. If you didn't receive a competitive score (or if your application was triaged), talk to the program office about your next steps, and whether to revise and resubmit your application.